In part two of a two part series Pravin Anand highlights some practical do’s and do-not’s in a typical trademark litigation in India. The article focuses on particular
The decision in Shreya Singhal v Union of India by the Supreme Court striking down the much maligned Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 is undoubtedly
E-tailers are more often than not unwilling to maintain resale price according to what the manufacturer expects. So much so that, along with the ease of ‘cash on
Envisaging the efforts for “consuming with care” marked by the celebrations of World Environment Day 2015, the firm embraced the theme of Reducing Consumption, Recycling Waste and Rebuilding
Anand and Anand has been ranked amongst FT25 in the Financial Times Innovative Lawyers 2015, and Pravin Anand picked ‘Most Innovative Lawyer’. Financial Times was “unanimous in picking Pravin Anand”
In a recently delivered decision, the Competition Commission dealt the first legal blow to the practice of discounting and pricing-below-cost, ordering an investigation into Ola’s practices on the basis
E-commerce websites in India can breathe a sigh of relief as the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has declined to order an investigation into the allegedly anti-competitive practice
Safir Anand talks brand and license practicalities at the 7th International Brand Licensing and Merchandising Show, organised by the Indian Franchise Association. Discussing the evolution of the legal profession,
The Amar Nath Sehgal case is a landmark decision in the realm of copyright law in India as the Delhi High Court recognized moral rights of the author of
The patentee Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Merck), along with its licensee Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a patent infringement law suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in April
