Tata vs. Kiran Jain CS (Comm) 145/2019 A suit was filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement and passing off of its registered trademarks, dilution and tarnishment of its trademarks,
India Business Law Journal Deals of the year 2017 have recognized four of our matters in its report. Taj Mahal Palace- rated as a star deal– Taj Mahal Palace
Tata Sons Limited, the registered proprietor of the TATA mark, had initiated proceedings against the defendants who were manufacturing and selling bags and suitcases under the mark TATA-L.
Clear directions issued by court regarding registration of well-known marks in one of the first cases since the introduction of Rule 124 of the Trademark Rules 2017. In
A Tata Sons’ group company and PepsiCo India Holdings Private Limited entered into a joint venture to produce non-carbonated, ready-to-drink beverages, one of which is ‘Tata Water Plus’,
Tata Sons obtains permanent injunction against defendants operating logistics business illegally using TATA for their trade and domain name. Legal fees and expenses awarded in suit despite defendants’
Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction summarily against defendants infringing TATA mark. Cost of litigation, fee of the local commissioner and compensatory damages also awarded without trial. The
A domain name technically is an internet address identifying a computer site or a website to the internet. In commercial parlance, a domain name can be described as a
In an earlier update we wrote about Tata’s successful action before the World Intellectual Property Organisation to halt the use of a domain confusingly similar to its own